CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Comparative evaluation of structural changes in acid etched primary enamel pretreated by 5.25 % sodium hypochlorite gel and solution – an sem study

Author: 
Dr. Darsana Krishnan, Dr. K. Korath Abraham, Dr. Ektah Khosla, Dr. Arun Roy James and Dr. Elza Thenumkal
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background: Resin based composite materials are widely used for aesthetically restoring primary teeth. Fundamental mechanism for resin - enamel adhesion relies on resin - micro tag formation. This is achieved by acid etching, where the smooth enamel surface is transformed into an irregular surface with increased surface energy. Primary enamel has increased organic content than permanent teeth which stand as a barrier in the way for achieving generalised retentive surface over the entire acid treated surface. Deproteinization of enamel is proposed as a non- invasive way by which organic protein content of enamel can be removed. 5.25 % sodium hypochlorite has been used as an endodontic irrigant due to excellent protein denaturing action, which might also be effective in removing organic content of primary enamel structure. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effect of sodium hypochlorite conditioning on the surface micro morphological features of acid etched primary enamel. Methods: Buccal enamel surface of 10 extracted human primary molars were cut and into trimmed to forty 2 mm2 blocks. Each group comprises of 10 enamel blocks (1mm2 size). Group 1: No treatment group Group 2: Enamel surface etched with 37 % H3PO4 for 15 sec, washed and dried for 10sec Group 3: Enamel surface pre-treated with 5.25% NaOCl solution for 120 seconds, washed, dried and etched as for Group1. Group 4: Enamel surface pre-treated with 5.25% NaOCl gel for 120 seconds, washed, dried and etched as for Group1. Samples subjected to SEM analysis and 5 microphotograhs of each sample were obtained at 500x magnification and evaluated for quality of etching pattern of enamel in percentage using Auto –CAD 2014 software. Statistical analysis used: Anova Result: The mean value of acid etching pattern was similar between Group 2 and Group 3( p = 0.78), but the mean value of acid etching was significantly lower in the Group 4 (p=0.04) than in the control group. Conclusion: Acid etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds still remains the best method of pretreatment in primary enamel. There is no significant effect of deproteinization with 5.25% NaOCl on acid etched enamel surface.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran