CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

 

 

 

Relationship between maximum size of the primary tumor and serum cea with preoperative clinical staging in rectal cancer patients

Author: 
Gupta N MD, DNB, Rathee N MBBS, Dimri K MD, DNB, Pandey AK MD and Goyal A PhD
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background: Patients in resource limited setup have limited access to preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The study aims to assess the relationship between maximum size of the primary tumor and baseline serum CEA with AJCC primary tumor stage (T) and nodal staging (N). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 67 rectal cancer patients, treated at a tertiary care centre was undertaken. Patients were evaluated for clinical profile and treatment details. Ordinal regression was employed to assess relationship between maximum size of the primary tumor, serum CEA and AJCC ‘T’ and ‘N’ staging. Results: Nearly 49% (n=33) patients presented in stage III, 66% (n=44) patients underwent abdominal perineal resection (APR), 46% (n=31) patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy while 21% (n=14) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The mean size of primary tumor (cm) and serum CEA (ng/ml) for the study participants was 5.47 (2-9) and 16.98 (0-112) respectively. For every one unit increase in maximum size of the primary tumor, there is a 0.437 times increase in the odds of the tumor upstaging (p=0.003). If the serum CEA increases by one unit, there is 0.011 times increase in the odds of number of positive nodes (p=0.049). Conclusions: Maximum size of the primary tumor and serum CEA were significant predictor of ‘T’ stage and ‘N’ stage respectively. In resource limited settings where affordability and accessibility to MRI limits accurate preoperative rectal cancer staging, maximum size of the primary tumor and serum CEA can complement CT findings for clinical staging and neoadjuvant treatment decisions.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

 

 

 

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Papa Serigne DIENE
Senegal
MIEZAN Essou Koffi Benjamin
Côte d’Ivoire
Dr. Govindaiah Simuni
USA
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran