CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

The comparative efficiency between conventional traditional stove and modern modified rocket stove in ladakh- analysis of time saving, energy saving and temperature variation on different chamber

Author: 
Tsewang Norboo
Subject Area: 
Life Sciences
Abstract: 

Ladakh a cold arid desert lie in the lap of trans Himalaya where temperature drop down more the minus 30°c in pick winter and in summer temperature scale up more than plus 30°c. such area is mainly accompany with cold climate where heat stove is the major essential commodity for inhabitant. Since existence of livelihood stove is the closed and major essential commodities of area. Cow dung and locally produce woods are the major source of fuel, with the passage of time and technology new modified and fuel efficient stoveswere developed one of which is Himalayan rocket stove which become highly popular and effective from last two to three year. This study examined comparative time saving, energy saving efficiency, purpose serve and heat lasting between traditional and modern modified rocket stove. The analyzed result reviled that in term of time saving traditional stove is better than modern stove (time taken by modern rocket stove to boil 2 lit of milk = 25 minute whereas traditional stove took 15 minute), Energy saving / fuel consumption is concern modern rocket stove is better than traditional stove (1050 gm of cow dung and 150 gm of wood consume to boil 2 lit of milk whereas rocket stove consume hardly 700gm of cow dung and 100 gm wood. In the case of heat lasting modern modified rocket stove is far batter then traditional stove may be better utilization of material, but multi-purpose serve is concern traditional stove serve much purpose then rocket stove. The study finding both the stove have their own limitation and advantage but can be improved by doing few modifications for better utilization.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran