CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Incidence of apical root resorption in segmental canine retraction using friction and frictionless mechanics

Author: 
Sukumar Balakrishnan, Karthi, M. and Raja, A.
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Aim: To evaluate the incidence and amount of periapical root resorption of maxillary and mandibular canines during fixed orthodontic treatment using friction and frictionless mechanics. Materials and Methods: The study population included patients aged in between 14 to 20 years undergoing orthodontic treatments in the Dept. Of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics. Twenty samples were selected by convenience sampling method and were divided into two groups namely, Group A (n=10): Segmental canine retraction using frictionless mechanics .Group B (n=10): Segmental canine retraction using friction mechanics. The group A and B patients underwent first pre molar extraction, 0.022 MBT brackets were bonded. The pre retraction radiographs and post retraction radiographs of maxillary and mandibular canines was obtained by standardized technique and external apical root resorption was evaluated using SOREDEX DIGORA imaging software. Result: The between group comparision i.e pre retraction and post retraction of frictionless mechanics and friction mechanics showed Z value of -1.250 and P value of 0.211 for pre retraction values and Z value of -1.402 and P value of 0.161 for post retraction values. The comparison of pre retraction values of two groups showed there is no statistically significant difference between two groups and hence they can be compared after intervention. The comparison of post retraction values of two groups showed there is no statistically significant difference between two groups. In within the group comparison the mean difference, Z value and P value of frictionless mechanism is 0.5, 0.00 and 1.00 respectively. The mean difference, Z value and P value of friction mechanism is 0.5, -1.0 and 0.310 respectively. Conclusion: Segmental canine retraction using friction and frictionless mechanics produces the same amount of apical root resorption.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

CHUDE NKIRU PATRICIA
Nigeria
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran