CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Assessment of acid base and electrolyte status in patients with chronic kidney disease

Author: 
Dr. Meena, O.P., Dr. Umesh Meena, Dr. Gautam Kumar Bunkar, Dr. Sanjeev Goyal, Dr. Ajay Singh, Dr. Shekhar Gurjar and Dr. Kanhaiya Lal Sharma
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) encompasses a spectrum of pathophysiologic processes associated with abnormal kidney function. The risk of worsening CKD is related with the GFR and the amount of albuminuria. Acid-base and electrolyte homeostasis is vital for proper functioning of numerous metabolic processes and organ functions and kidneys play a critical role in the maintenance and regulation of this homeostasis. Kidney diseases and dysfunction (chronic kidney disease, CKD) results in alterations of electrolyte and acid-base balances. Therefore, we aimed to assessment of Acid Base and Electrolyte Status in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease for an early detection of CKD and to identify the factors associated with it. Methods: A Prospective observational study was conducted from Aug 2022 to July 2023 among all CKD patient of different stages and different etiology admitted in medicine and nephrology department of MBGH and associated hospital of R.N.T. Medical college Udaipur, Rajasthan. For albuminuria urine ACR was used. For acid base status (H+,PH, HCO) arterial blood gas analysis (ABG) was done as per standard protocol. Venous samples were taken for analysis of H, PH, HCO3 Na, K, CI. Ca, Mg, and Phosphorus. Urine sample sent for urinary cast and complete urine analysis. All data statistically analysed by SPSS version 17. P value <0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Results: This study found acidosis in 76.7% patients, in which Maximum 48.2% belongs to stage G5 followed by stage 4,stage G3b, 12.5% in each, 3.5% belongs to stage G3a. In acidosis Hypertension and diabetes was most responsible factor in 28 patient either independent or with combined effect. 5.3% were due to obstructive uropathy, 3.5% each were due to autoimmune and PCKD. Infectious cause were also associated with 3.5%. Hyperkalemia was found in 37.5% while 5.3% were hypokalemic. In hyperkalemia group maximum 25% patient was in stage G5 followed by G4(5.3%), G3B (5.3) in equal then in stage G3a(1.7%). In hypokalemia 3.5% belongs to stage G3b and 1.7% in stage G3a. in study hyponatremia was found in 19.4% patient and hypernatremia in 5.3%. Hypermagnesemia found in 25% patients and hypomagnesaemia in 5.3%. Conclusions: It is imperative to monitor hypertension, metabolic disorders (DM,etc.) and serum electrolytes concentration in renal dysfunction patients to slow the progression of CKD to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and other serious complications because maximum patient in our study were in stage G5 and mostly caused by either hypertension or diabetes or both. Metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, hypomagnesemia, hyperchloremia, hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia were the most common electrolytes imbalance in CKD.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

CHUDE NKIRU PATRICIA
Nigeria
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran