CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Comparison And Variation Of Various Vertical Cephalometric Parameters In Different Sagittal jaw dysplasias

Author: 
Dr. Sheikh Zahid Nazir and Dr. Mohammad Mushtaq
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background: Most of the malocclusions that we often encounter are in sagittal direction, however most of the malocclusions that occur in sagittal dimensions are often accompanied by discrepancies in vertical dimensions. It is rare that we will find an anteroposterior discrepancy without the vertical dimension being affected. Numerous methods are available to diagnose the malocclusion in sagittal dimensions but there are considerably fewer methods available for vertical analysis. So multiple cephalometric analysis are used to diagnose vertical skeletal facial discrepancies associated with sagittal malocclusion. Aims and objectives: This study was aimed to identify and compare the various vertical cephalometric parameters that perform best for the identification of vertical skeletal pattern in different sagittal dysplasias. Materials and Methods: A total sample of 60 subjects with 20 subjects in each Class I, Class II and Class III skeletal groups were included. The age groups 18–30 years were included with male and female subjects. The vertical cephalometric parameters were measured and variation was studied and comparison was done in each group of sagittal dysplasia, and mean values, SDs, and P values were calculated by applying descriptive statistics along with Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparison among three skeletal groups by using Statistical software SPSS (version 20.0) and Microsoft Excel. The level of significance was set at p value < 0.05. Results: The descriptive statistical analysis was first done to find out the means of each parameter along with the standard deviation in each group whether increased or decreased from the mean average value. After that comparison was done for each parameter among the three groups to find out any statistically significant difference by using Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for intergroup comparison. On doing the intergroup comparison statistically significant difference was found in saddle angle amongst three groups with p value less < 0.026 which was considered statistically significant. Statistically significant differences were also found between symphyseal angle and symphyseal H/A with p value < 0.012 and < 0.006 respectively which was considered statistically significant, however statistically no significant differences were found in other parameters on doing intergroup comparison. Conclusions: Different parameters were used in this study to identify vertical disharmony in different sagittal classes. In skeletal class II subjects the condyle is posteriorly placed in glenoid fossa and mandible is retrognathic with respect to cranial base due to large saddle angle and articular angle and mandibular plane to true horizontal plane angulation shows vertical growth direction. Symphyseal angle is obtuse in class II subjects with wide and short symphysis in both class I and Class II subjects. In class III patients lower gonial angle is increased with vertical growth direction, there is increased ramal length and lower facial height from ANS to Gn is also increased. Vertical soft tissue parameters i.e.; (vertical lip: chin ratio) are within normal range in all the three classes.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran